Internationally trained occupational therapists need Grade B across all four OET sub-tests for HCPC (UK) or AHPRA (Australia) registration. The Writing sub-test asks for structured functional handover, not narrative session recap.
Quick answer
Internationally trained occupational therapists need Grade B (350) in each of the four OET sub-tests for HCPC (UK) and AHPRA (Australia) registration. The Writing sub-test tests your ability to summarise functional outcomes in structured prose. Most marks are lost on Organisation & Layout — narrative session-by-session recaps rather than outcome-first handovers.
Sent to a community OT, GP, or another rehabilitation service summarising the inpatient OT intervention, functional outcomes, and recommended ongoing support.
Marking watch-out: Organisation — open with current functional status and outcome, not the chronology of sessions.
Sent to a community team, social services, or funding body justifying equipment provision or home modification based on functional findings.
Marking watch-out: Purpose — the recommendation must lead, with findings supporting it directly afterwards.
Stop recounting every therapy session chronologically. Open with current functional status and outcome of intervention. Mapped criterion: Organisation & Layout.
Stop using ADLs, IADLs, transfers, or FIM scores without context for non-OT addressees. Expand on first use. Mapped criterion: Genre & Style.
Stop listing every functional finding. Include only findings that justify the discharge plan, equipment request, or onward referral. Mapped criterion: Conciseness & Clarity.
The UK HCPC and Australian AHPRA both accept OET for OT registration. Grade B (350) is required across all four sub-tests. Combined sittings within the validity window are accepted.
OTs typically write a discharge or transfer letter following inpatient rehabilitation — addressed to a community team or another OT service — or a recommendation letter for equipment, home modification, or ongoing support. Case notes commonly include functional assessment outcomes, ADL/IADL findings, and goal-oriented intervention.
Two patterns dominate. First, narrative-style assessments that recount every session rather than summarising functional outcomes (Organisation & Layout). Second, OT-specific shorthand — ADLs, IADLs, transfers, FIM scores — used without context (Genre & Style).
Yes. Functional assessment, goal-setting frameworks, and discharge planning differ from medical handover. Profession-aware correction ensures feedback covers the structured narrative OTs need — not generic clinical letter style.
Marked against the six OET criteria by a corrector aware of functional assessment frameworks and discharge planning conventions. 24-hour turnaround.
Get My Letter CorrectedWant an expert's eyes on your occupational therapy? Dr Mariam's OET writing correction service marks every letter against all six OET writing criteria and returns line-by-line corrections within 24–72 hours.
See how it works